Limitation Act — Quick Revision for Judiciary Exam 2026
Limitation Act 1963 — Complete Quick Revision Guide
Limitation Act 1963 — procedural law jo court mein suit, appeal, ya application file karne ki time limit fix karta hai. Judiciary exams mein Limitation Act se regularly questions aate hain — specific limitation periods, computation rules, aur exceptions. Is guide mein comprehensive revision karenge.
Why Limitation Law Exists
Policy behind limitation law: (1) Prevent stale claims, (2) Protect defendants from claims they cannot effectively defend (evidence lost, witnesses died), (3) Encourage diligence in asserting rights. "Vigilantibus non dormientibus jura subveniunt" — law aids the vigilant, not those who sleep on their rights.
Key Provisions — Sections 1-24
Section 2 — Definitions
Important definitions: "period of limitation" — period specified in Schedule for filing. "Prescribed period" — period of limitation computed per Act. "Defendant" includes respondent. "Plaintiff" includes appellant/applicant. "Suit" — civil proceedings in court.
Section 3 — Bar of Limitation
Court shall dismiss suit/appeal/application filed after prescribed period — even if not pleaded by defendant. Court must examine limitation suo motu. Exception: if court is satisfied sufficient cause exists for condoning delay under Section 5.
Section 4 — Expiry on Holiday
If last day of limitation is public holiday — can file on next open day. "Public holiday" — as per Negotiable Instruments Act. This is a saving provision — limitation extended if last day falls on holiday/closure of court.
Section 5 — Extension of Prescribed Period
Condonation of delay — for appeals and applications (NOT for suits). Court may condone delay if "sufficient cause" shown. "Sufficient cause" — liberal interpretation in most courts (Collector Land Acquisition v. Katiji — SC held liberal approach, refusing to penalize for technical reasons if no prejudice to other side). Recent trend — courts more strict about delays in some cases, particularly when delay is long and no adequate explanation.
Section 6 — Legal Disability
If person entitled to file suit under disability (minor, insane, idiot) when right of action accrues — limitation runs from date disability ceases (attains majority, regains sanity). Maximum — 3 years from when disability ceases, or original period from when right accrued — whichever is later.
Section 7 — Effect of Legal Disability on Other Persons
When one of several plaintiffs is under disability — limitation runs as if no disability exists for others (except co-heirs under certain family law situations).
Section 8 — Special Cases
Where specific period of limitation provided — that overrides general Section 6 provisions for disability. Special limitation overrides general provisions.
Section 9 — Continuous Running of Time
Once limitation starts running — it does not stop running. Intervening disability does not suspend running limitation (unlike Section 6 — where disability at time of accrual prevents limitation from starting). If limitation has already started — disability does not help.
Sections 12-16 — Computation of Period
Section 12 — exclude day on which right accrues. Section 13 — exclude time for obtaining certified copy in appeals. Section 14 — exclude time spent in bona fide prosecution of proceedings in court without jurisdiction. Section 15 — exclude time of injunction/stay order. Section 16 — exclude time during which person unable to file due to fraud.
Section 17 — Effect of Fraud
If suit based on fraud or fact concealed by fraud — limitation runs from when plaintiff discovered/could have discovered fraud. Protection against fraudulent concealment. Applies also to mistake (Section 17(1)(b)).
Section 18 — Acknowledgement
Written acknowledgement of liability — limitation starts fresh from date of acknowledgement. Must be in writing, signed by person against whom it is claimed. Must be made before limitation expires — cannot revive already time-barred debt. Acknowledgement must admit existence of liability — not merely facts.
Section 19 — Payment
Payment of principal or interest of debt — fresh limitation from payment date. Must be before limitation expires. Must be acknowledged in writing signed by person making payment — OR can be proved by other evidence. Applies to debts and enforceable contracts only.
The Schedule — Important Periods
Schedule to Limitation Act specifies period for each type of suit/appeal/application. Key entries:
Suits Relating to Accounts
- Money deposited with bank — 3 years from date of demand
- Account between merchant and agent — 3 years from last entry in mutual accounts
Suits Relating to Contracts
- Simple money suits — 3 years from date cause of action accrues
- Suit on mortgage — 12 years from date amount becomes due
- Suit to enforce charge — 12 years
Suits Relating to Immovable Property (Most Important)
- Article 65 — suit by person dispossessed of immovable property — 12 years from date of dispossession
- Article 64 — suit based on adverse possession — 12 years from when adverse possession became known to plaintiff
- Article 58 — suit to cancel decree — 3 years from when knowledge of decree received
Suits Relating to Movable Property
- Article 36 — suit for return of movable property — 3 years from date demand made
- Article 40 — suit for compensation for wrongfully taking movable property — 3 years from taking
Torts
- Article 74 — suit for compensation for libel — 1 year from publication
- Article 72 — suit for malicious prosecution — 3 years
- Article 75 — suit for compensation for personal injuries from accident — 3 years
Appeals
- Article 116 — appeal to High Court from original/appellate decree — 90 days
- Article 116 (also) — appeal to SC — 90 days from decree
- Special Leave Petition to SC — 90 days from judgment (subject to SC discretion under Article 136)
Applications
- Article 137 — any other application not specifically mentioned — 3 years from when right accrues
Adverse Possession — Sections 25-27 and Article 65
Adverse possession: if person possesses another's property openly, peacefully, continuously, and with claim of right for the limitation period — person loses right to recover property. Article 65 — 12 years for suits regarding land. Government property — 30 years. Adverse possession requires: actual possession, open and visible, exclusive, continuous, hostile (under claim of right), for statutory period.
Key Case Laws
- Collector Land Acquisition v. Katiji (1987) — liberal approach to Section 5 condonation of delay. Courts should not be hyper-technical.
- Hindustan Steel Works v. State of Kerala — mere submission of application not sufficient; adequate explanation of each day's delay required.
- Karnataka Board of Wakf v. Government of India (2004) — Supreme Court cannot condone delay in Article 136 petition in the same manner as ordinary courts — specific reasons needed.
- Bimlesh Tanwar v. State of Haryana (2003) — fresh period of limitation from acknowledgement.
Target20 Limitation Act Coverage
Limitation Act is a technical law — specific periods, computation rules, and exceptions — all require memorization combined with understanding. Anoop Sir's approach makes this manageable: focus on the most frequently tested articles, understand the computation rules, and master the exceptions (Sections 5, 14, 17, 18, 19). Our quick revision material specifically for Limitation Act is available to all enrolled students.
Free demo class: target20judiciary.in
Conclusion
Limitation Act preparation strategy: (1) Understand why limitation law exists, (2) Master the computation provisions (Sections 12-17), (3) Know the condonation provisions (Section 5 for appeals/applications, Section 17 for fraud), (4) Memorize key articles from Schedule — especially Articles 36, 65, 74, 116, 137, (5) Know adverse possession requirements. This systematic approach makes Limitation Act manageable and scoreable.